Essay: Poetry, Good, Evil and You
Most people, most of the time, and this includes myself, are
not facing the unbelievable, awesome, scary aspects of what it is to be human
in the early 21st century. I
think some compartmentalization is fine and even necessary. Many of us need a buffer, some peace in other
callings, activities or entertainments. And yet it is vital, as well, to engage with
the critical issues of these mind-boggling times. To plunge in with full veracity.
My poems, I hope, are aspects of the call. My poems, really, are a way of dealing with a
spectrum of brutal emotions, while adventuring in the crucible of the
soul. Ecstasy flows through me, love and
anguish, and also hate [1]. These raw
forces can be shattering. Or they can be
channeled into deepest expression and liberation. A poet can be an alchemist, working with
passion for purposes which ultimately advance the Good.
Before addressing the big question of whether we will go
down a Good path or an Evil one, it is important to spell out some of the extreme
changes we face in the near future. The scary
options presented below are not necessary futures, but they are likely futures,
if we don’t act maturely and ethically to manage the godlike technology we are
currently evolving.
Again, all this is very stressful to even broach, let alone
ponder. My way of dealing with it is
poetry. One of the main purposes of this
essay is to get you to think about how you can deal with it.
Our Near Future: Option One, self-deselection and AI
supremacy
What’s so scary about our times, even compared to the general
human condition, which has always been fraught with danger, challenge and
stress?
As I wrote in a 2002 academic article, which is now a
reference in the Wikipedia entry on cyborgs, we are likely to combine our
natural bodies with implanted technology.
When? Soon and at a reckless pace. This involves artificial or enhanced limbs
and organs, yes, but also connecting our brains to computers and an ultra-invasive
internet [2].
I argue that this process, in our current culture of
profit-making and competition, will lead to self-deselection: we will change what we are so much that we
become some new kind of species, one created outside the biological channels of
evolution. If this happens, humanity as
we know it, and as it has existed for hundreds of thousands of years, will be
gone. It will also have profound effects
on all of planetary nature, including what creatures and biomes remain and how.
How far away is this transformation? It has already started
and will likely proceed in stages. Artificial limb and brain chips
already exist. If we are reckless,
consumed with a rush for immediate power and new abilities, then within 200
years we will be a lot more similar to robots and robots will be a lot more
similar to us.
Indeed, through a
brain-connected internet, it is possible for multiple entities to
telepathically share and combine. The
scenario where AI controls us, or even effectively turns us into its slaves,
gains traction if we are all wired up to each other under AI super-centers.
Our Near Future:
Option Two, nuclear annihilation
War has been a problem since farming was invented. But never of such a world-shaking magnitude. A scary possibility for our
future is the obvious Sword of Damocles hanging over our heads; namely, World
War 3 and nuclear annihilation. Given
the current tilt of politics toward bellicose dictators, which mirrors the
conditions before World War 2, it is a decent bet to say that this is our most
likely future.
Tens of thousands of nuclear
warheads are ready to launch. Egomaniacal,
saber-rattling, insecure dictators on golden thrones, petty men who won’t back down
= BOOM.
This is where we are at
Even if we avoid a hellish finality, super-powerful technology
is emergent. Right now, we seem almost eager
to hand over our existence to AI overlords.
This is the theater in the round, the world stage, on which you
and I dwell, circa early 21st century. We are in the flow of a rapidly changing,
technology-driven metamorphosis. Our
leaders seem all-in on advancing as vigorously as economic forces allow. Such forces are the primary driver in our primitive,
barbaric culture, our poor level of maturity and (lack of) ethos.
The Most Important Choice We Face: Ethics
Can we actually mature and consider our fate more
wisely? Is it even doable? The answer is yes. It involves reasonable,
ethical decision-making.
Clearly, though, it is not foreclosed that we will suddenly
wise up. What we do now, what choices we
make, are part of a unique historic flow.
You and I participate in shaping greater future destinies. Will we advance our ethics, or stay trapped
in the primitive system of vice that rules us now?
If we make certain choices, whether recklessly, or by
failing to take a stand, acquiescing to the powers that be, we are likely to be
among the last few generations of human beings to walk the earth. As I outline above, we could replace
ourselves with cyborg ‘upgrades.’ Or we
could annihilate ourselves in a future-tech war.
The crossroads is here.
There are two possible forms of government we can support.
One type of government trends Evil
Humanity, right now, has a choice between two forms of
global governance. One is based on idols
and tyranny: cult-levels of ignorance,
fear-mongery, and totalitarian control.
The other is based on democracy:
reason, equality and mutual flourishing through a merger of science,
critical thinking and ethics.
I have written in many previous blog entries that ethics can
be mobilized as a technology [3].
The totalitarian model of governance, as I argue in many
essay on this blog, is Evil. A fictional
character, the Grand Inquisitor, in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov,
elaborates on this model quite well. The
Grand Inquisitor argues for a Pact with the Devil while pretending to follow
Christ. The basic argument is that fear
and ignorance are the only way to keep humans in line, due to limitations in
our very nature. It is an Orwellian model. Preach freedom but enforce slavery, preach
love but inculcate the hate and fear of scapegoat-ism.
This is also a Machiavellian model. In The Prince, Machiavelli argues that fear is the
best way to control people. This is
certainly true, but only at a certain level of immature culture. All the god kings since ancient Sumer have
used it as a psychological weapon of control.
One type of government trends Good
The democratic model of governance follows the path of the
Good. It accepts a Pact with
Honesty. Scientific truths, therapeutic
psychological awareness, and the basic idea of human equality. We are all the same kind of cognitive animal and
self-evidently deserve rights. Fair and
just treatment. In the Brothers
Karamazov, Dostoevsky labels this as the choice of love and reason over fear
and fanaticism.
We have a choice right now between Good and Evil
You and I live at a critical juncture. It is largely a barbaric, vicious and fraught
time. But ancient ways of darkness have
been challenged effectively. This means
that both ignorance-based governance and reason-based governance are viable
paths. Will we dare to support compassion,
virtue and psychological health? Or will be bow down to ignorance, fear and
hate-mongery? This can be summarized succinctly as: will we mature?
Neutrality is not an option:
The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never
make up their minds to be good or evil--Hannah Arendt
The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in
time of moral crisis preserve their neutrality"-- JFK (uncertain attribution)
Either Good or Evil will win
All this, again, is very stress-making. Trust me, I know. My poems help me to achieve and maintain the
honesty needed to face the situation--the existential crisis--I describe
above. In my poetry, I channel very
intense passions of many kinds from many chambers in my heart. It is atrociously hard to face what is
going on right now. A true struggle
between Tyranny and Democracy.
Fear versus love. Ignorance
versus truth. Obedience versus freedom.
Good takes us in one direction. Evil takes in another. For more details on why one or the other will
eventually encompass the globe, see my essay titled, “The Purgatory Principle.”
[4])
Scenario 1: Evil
Wins
If we blow ourselves up in a nuclear armageddon, that is to
succumb to Evil. Some humans will
survive, probably. But they will start
all over with the same god-king warlordism.
Might makes right. Eventually these
survivors will rebuild, get nuclear weapons once more, and likely destroy civilization
again. This could lead to a hellish cycle. The way out would be to give up
ignorance-based governance. Reject the
path of fear and chose the path of Good (see option three below).
Scenario 2: Evil
Wins
A second possibility is that technology will become strong
enough to totally control each and every
citizen. No way to rebel or do anything
but obey. Suicide might not even be an
option. Robot police and robot military
everywhere. Seamless AI
surveillance. And, most cruel of all, a
brain chip in every head, enforcing control from within.
This level of puppetry will be possible within a
few hundred years. If malignant
narcissistic dictators are still in charge at that time, as they are now--despotic patriarchs who crave total control--it will happen.
An alternative form of hell
A totalitarian dungeon can, in a rare case, avoid nuclear
annihilation, but the result is simply another kind of hell, the total
mind-enslavement described above. War is
avoided if a single totalitarian system takes over the entire world--and
somehow does this without getting in a nuclear war.
Again, though, such an existence would be a living hell. An example from sci-fi is The Borg from Star
Trek. The Borg assimilates whatever civilization
and planet it conquers into an machine-flesh network controlled by a central
AI.
Scenario 3:
Good wins
A third option is that humanity embraces ethics-as-technology. This would allow us to act with honesty, to
reject big-lie loyalty tests under emperors who ‘wear no clothes.’ We would implement scientific advances, not in
order to oppress, but rather to create flourishing, mutually beneficial
environments: win/win situations where
the beauty of the planet and humanity both thrive.
This is path of the Good.
It works to eliminate the threat of nuclear annihilation. It also preserves the humanity of future
citizens, who ethically choose not to merge with machines.
Imagine AI and robots being supportive, angelic guides,
rather than oppressive authoritarian jailers who monitor us for loyalty and
subservience. Imagine learning how to dance
with your emotions and passions, both
light and dark, and channel that psychic energy to find your own unique,
beautiful voice--to sublimate, to achieve catharsis, to find
actualization.
A lot of individual people have chosen this path
already. Therapeutic psychology has a better understanding than ever before on how to achieve such states.
Try to imagine our innate
“moral sentiments” cultivated and nurtured, not trampled down by the bottomless
egos of saber-rattling, insecure, vindictive, trophy-hungry kings [5].
The danger is great, but progress has been made toward
the Good
We are stuck in a primitive cultural loop that has been
going on for thousands of years. I call this ongoing mental contamination/indoctrination
the Ignorance Vortex. Millennia of god
kings have made Pacts with Ignorance. What
does this mean? It means big-lie
rhetoric. Religious fanaticism. Hate-stoked division and warfare. These are the strategies that allow plutocracy,
patriarchy and kleptocracy to domineer.
We have been traumatized by this history. We believe it is inevitable, since it has
always been part of civilization. Not a
single person ever born in a ‘civilized’ state, including you and me, knows
what it is like to be raised in a Good society.
We haven’t been given the chance.
That said, the Good is a possible future for us. We have the brain- and the
cultural-plasticity to advance our collective maturity. And--importantly--we have started to do
it. A lot of progress toward the Good
has been made in, say, the last 150 years.
The greatest invention in the entire history of human civilization
I’ve proclaimed and argued, over and over, mostly to deaf
ears, that the greatest invention since the Agricultural Revolution--going back
around twelve thousand years--is the right for women to vote. Universal suffrage. This is huge.
Humanity not only conceptualized equality but made it real.
This wonderful feat broke out of the original Big Lie, the grand deceit that programmed
everyone not only to believe in the inferiority of women--physically, mentally
and morally--but also to transmit the same mental programming to the next
generation. On and on…
Breaking out of the original Big Lie demonstrates that we
can listen to reason and follow a path of ethics-as-technology.
For emphasis: it is
possible for the Good to be our path.
Gay marriage. Made legal in the
USA in 2015. Civil Rights in the 1960’s. LGBTQ+ rights have advanced, too. I don’t deny that all these gains and more are
in jeopardy. Indeed, this essay hopes to
bring out the peril we face. And yet
also, thereby, the exigent importance of standing up.
Humanity has mostly embraced medicine as a technology. This was a big change from faith-based
healing. This shows that we can embrace
ethics-as-technology.
I refer to ethics-as-technology
as lightcraft (the working title of my book is Lightcraft). Lightcraft uses science, psychology and critical thinking to
advance the Good. Darkcraft uses science, psychology and critical thinking to
maximize the control of dictators.
Technologies of many kinds (psychological, computational, robotic... ) can make both
lightcraft and darkcraft more capable of advancing their goal: Good or Evil.
What is your choice?
How will you handle it?
Again, I know it is hard to face all this. Who wants to confront decisions that affect the
future of civilization as it grows, evolves, and even expands into space. The very thought of it is intimidating and
averse.
Yes, it can be agonizing.
But there is also liberation, ecstasy and love. This is why I write poetry. Poetry is my steam valve and expression.
What is yours? How do
you sustain yourself in following a path of Goodness?
You can do this.
========================
Footnotes
(1) https://owlwholaughs.blogspot.com/2025/10/essay-on-hate.html
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyborg (further
reading: Crittenden, Chris. 2002.
"Self-Deselection: Technopsychotic Annihilation via Cyborg." Ethics
& the Environment 7(2):127–152.
(3) Some samples:
https://owlwholaughs.blogspot.com/2025/05/draft-intro-of-my-book-better-angels.html
https://owlwholaughs.blogspot.com/2025/09/essay-apotheosis-problem.html
(4) https://owlwholaughs.blogspot.com/2026/01/essay-most-important-law-in-physics.html
(5) The Theory of
Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/67363